Don't take me wrongly, I believe all of us here know the reason why I questioned your post. And in case someone --or anyone-- didn't, I raised this issue because nowadays there are a lot of projects who tried to fake interests and hyping up their project by asking someone --and paid them-- or one of their members to fake some questions and feign interests. Beyond's case is rather unique, because the project were merited by a trusted member, yet it had its own member asking about the project they're in, so I would really love to clear this to avoid further doubt from anyone, and me myself, in the future.
If I may ask further for the sake of clarification, does it mean the project take a drastic turn and changes since you leave them? Given you had to ask about ethical and technical issue they may raise
OK. Your right to check the project for the absence of affiliated members in this thread. Thank's for questions , I also have a rule to carefully check the project idea, documentation and team before entrusting them my money. So I ask questions too))
Sorry, I think I am lost on this part. If we could take one step backward, were you here as an early investor who previouslt planted their money and now returned to do the same once more, or as a developer team?
On a different note, I'm agree that it's very important to do in depth research and ask questions o every project we put our interest on.