Literally? I do not want to get caught up in the meaning of literally.
Anyhow, part of the reason that we have some of this back and forth communication on this topic is b/c we have differing understandings on some terms, including the term coercion. So, at this point, I am a little unclear about the point that you are making Dreamspark? Did you want to chime in to clarify what is so clear about coercion and why living in society is coercion?
There are people from third world countries who are fighting for the chance to live in america, in spite of all its supposedly "coercive" taxes.
Clearly in its original meaning as he had just told you why. * facepalm
Anyhow, you can try and say we have different understandings of the term but that is not the case. You have a different understanding of it in comparison to the real definition. Look, "Persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats:" is the dictionary definition of coercion. If you can argue that being a part of society in regards to paying taxes against your will under the threat of force is not coercion then I'll be flabbergasted.
Perhaps we can try a different approach cause Im pretty bored of seeing your sensless rants. Can you explain how it is not coercion as an explaination as to why it is coercion has been offered several times.