The Lawyer prefers to know first what is the position of the Italian authorities about his lying complain. But if this silence keeps going, it will mean that the Rock CFO is hiding that the complain was already dismissed. And thus a complain will be presented against him.

His "arbiter" (even if he existed) is completely irrelevant. He already confessed that he controls the "arbiter" and the money. The account where he sent that money is just a "segregated" account that he fully controls.

The Rock CFO has my money and will answer for it.

My point is that he (again) repeatedly, during some months, lied about having sent the money to a third party not controlled by him (and, thus, claimed falsely that he no longer has my money) and that is criminal fraud!.