Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: BTC Needs A Privacy Layer
by
o_e_l_e_o
on 30/05/2021, 07:36:36 UTC
⭐ Merited by pooya87 (1)
Bitcoin was made to be a currency not an asset that you trade on some exchange whether centralized or otherwise. If you use it as a currency none of your arguments stand anymore.
If everyone used it as a currency, then none of the arguments would stand. But when someone like me comes along, who isn't interested in day trading at all and just wants to use it as a currency, and tries to spend bitcoin with a merchant who just wants to immediately send the bitcoin I spend to an exchange and convert it to fiat, then the arguments absolutely still stand. As long as merchants, retailers, counter parties, etc., want to use centralized exchanges to convert back to fiat, then the fungibility of my coins absolutely matters. Exchanges are blacklisting some coins, and now mining pools are blacklisting some coins. BitPay already block users based on IP address and location. It's not a huge stretch of the imagination to reach the point where payment processors start blacklisting some coins too. And sure, the argument again is if everyone just accepted bitcoin themselves without centralized payment processors this wouldn't be an issue, but we both know that is never going to happen.

I repeat my first post here; I'm not against more privacy in bitcoin but the problem is not with bitcoin protocol, the real problem is with centralization.
I don't necessarily disagree, but there is absolutely zero chance of convincing governments to stop regulating against bitcoin, stop centralized exchanges enforcing these regulations, or convince every bitcoin user in the world to move to decentralized exchanges. Our only option left is to improve the fungibility of bitcoin at a protocol level.