Thanks.

I haven't read what's Taproot yet, besides the known fact that it it helps with privacy, but aren't all those you mentioned soft forks? How do you vision a protocol change that would make Bitcoin transaction outputs interchangeable? Wouldn't we have to move onto implementations like ring signatures that would create hard forks?

Who exactly is the community? This forum? The developers? The miners? The majority of its users? I think that in Bitcoin, the word “community” is highly abused. How can one define what's the community on a consensus based system?

I'll skip the Taproot part, because as I said, I'm unaware. What solution do you propose that will make Bitcoin fungible, but won't affect the already existent wallets? With ring signatures, they'd have to change.

What's wrong with altcoins?