Re: German Study Shows 14% More Vegetation Over the Past 100 years from added CO2
You contradict yourself, sort of. The links in the article alone show loads of scientists who have done studies just like the OP says. So, is your education some kind of niche education? Or are you simply focusing on one side of what you learned?
You misunderstand. I'm not questioning that scientists have performed studies that demonstrate that increased CO2 helps plant life - when considered by itself, i.e. ignoring effects of climate change, such as increased temperature and changing (and more extreme) weather patterns. 'CO2 is good for plants' is basic scientific truth. It's not controversial at all. I'm simply asking who your 'some alarmists' are - presumably, as they don't understand science, they are from the climate-skeptic side?If all you are asking is who my 'some alarmists' are, with regard to this topic in this thread, I don't know that I have any. And I am not sure how to apply the term 'some alarmists' to this thread in the way you might mean it... whatever way that is.
If you would like to see what 'some alarmists' means to the author(s) of the website(s) linked in the OP, my first idea for you to do is to peruse the website(s). If you don't get clarification there, perhaps you could try to contact the author(s), somehow.
Other than that, how about web searches on 'some alarmists' with other reference words so that the search engines can find the kind of alarmists you are looking for.
Life is difficult. Sometimes we don't get what we want.
