hahahaha, you are fucktwat lucky enough.

I will concede, however, that is a funny point about some bitcoiners holding onto their bitcoin forever and ever, and sure, that does seem a wee bit retarded.. I will admit that.

It also seems a wee bit retarded that a nocoiner, like your dumbass lil selfie, could actually know about bitcoin and study it but still admit to being 100% nocoiner.. what a fucking tool.. if we can even believe your supposed baloney position.... Anywhoo, a nocoiner who knows about bitcoin seems way more retarded than the coiner who refuses to spend any bitcoin.. for a variety of reasons.

I do believe that there are some coiners who proclaim that they are "never" going to spend any of their bitcoin, but they are likely pretty goddamned young to have that kind of a nonsense perspective... and surely if they already have a lot of non-bitcoin resources they can surely take that position and not even suffer, and gosh, I doubt even Michael Saylor really believes that when it comes to actually attempting to apply the matter of spending bitcoin in the real world including circumstances in which bitcoins might be the ONLY thing that is left for some people who may have ended up spending most of their other assets/currencies and even good will (such as credit).... I have already provided some pretty damned compelling scenarios (if I do say so myself) in which spending some bitcoin and shaving off some bitcoin seems to be the way more practical and prudent way forward... so yeah, it does seem to be a bit of an extreme to identify some bitcoiner extremists and maximalists who are going to die while gripping their bitcoins as a wee bit of an exaggeration... even though we do hear some spouting off such seemingly pie in the sky nonsense.

Don't get me wrong.  I surely agree with concepts of Metcalfe's law, and I am hardly even considering that we are going to get to a world in which bitcoin is the ONLY currency/asset or thing of value.. that is just not even theoretically feasible, yet  I do believe and understand that if any of us have a variety of options of what to spend, likely bitcoin is going to be pretty damned close to the lowest on that list (especially if we have other options), so sure we are going to be spending several of our inferior assets and currencies first, yet it makes little to no sense to give up some material goods just to refuse to spend a bitcoin (or a satoshi for that matter).


Any nocoiner who knows about bitcoin in the present is way more than that guy.  So you, lucky, don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

The person who chose to be a no coiner in 2011 gets a way BIGGER pass than the person who knows about bitcoin (expresses opinions about bitcoin) and chooses to be a no coiner today.