I think whenever someone complaints about a casino that I know and trust, I usually wait for a response from the casino itself, they always have a better response with better proof, because they know they are not scamming anyone, so it is easier to provide proof that way. I have seen too many people who tried to scam casinos and I know that it is not really that easy for these casinos to "fly under the radar" for their scams if they ever tried it.

We have seen casinos who scammed customers as well, and they get caught in a second they try to do something like that and they get so much negative review that you hear about it and they are closed within a week very easily. So if wolf.bet ever tried something like that, it wouldn't be a sudden shocking realization, it would have been something very common. Long story short we are not seeing anything like that here, it is impossible.

I agree, it is always better to get both sides of the story. I also tend not to pay much attention to newbie accusations without 100% solid proof. Most of the time it's just a user who lost and is looking to create bad PR trying to get a refund.