Interesting. OP has been editing their posts.
Back on page 6:
Can you also please elaborate on this:
First of all, Gapcoin follows Riecoin's way and uses enough Miller-Rabin tests with random bases to avoid composite numbers being accepted as Prove of Work, like Primecoin mistakenly could.
Checking back though pp1-6, there's no such statement in any of j0nn9's posts to be quoted, so it must have been subsequently edited out.
On different topic, Riecoin
successfully upgraded to 0.20
back in March and is now on
0.21 with the benefit of having TapRoot and Schnorr signatures available via soft fork.
Somewhat obviously, while the Gapcoin network remains predominantly hosted on 0.9 clients, there is no point in me pursuing any upgrade of Gapcoin to 0.20/0.21.
Cheers
Graham