Consider this example. If you buy potatoes for cheap and sell them for a higher cost, without mentioning the source of purchase to the buyer, does that tag you as a scammer?
Enough of this "scammer" fallacy. The red trust rating does not necessarily mean "scammer". It means "high risk". Whether the risk of voluntarily tipping someone for doing fuck all is "high" - a matter of opinion, but when it involves money and deception I wouldn't be so adamant calling the red trust a mistake.
Because I was writing replies here and doing some work, once I was done, I would have obviously messaged him.
It wasn't obvious at all:
I haven't messaged him because I rather prefer him
I am just telling you to verify stats posted by others
Here's a better idea: stop telling me what to do and use the saved time to "verify stats" yourself, whatever that means. Win-win.