Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Review on apollo btc miner
by
kano
on 14/06/2021, 02:56:40 UTC
uh what?

You dont need to "prove" it can hit a block, the proof is in the valid share submission.

Submit enough shares of a certain difficulty over time and you have "proved" your hashrate.

Submit a share higher than the network diff you found a block, simple as that.

Well same as you my position is exactly what you said. Just worded in a different way.

Kano always attacks all btc sha-256 software

He will say you stole it from cgminer and if it clear is not a copy he will say prove it can hit a block.

As I said I am in the USA and you are innocent until proven guilty which means if he wants to complain about blocks he needs to prove it can't hit a block.
Sigh, another person who really doesn't understand how software and hardware works.
I've given a really simply example on my post above this.

Also making false accusations really make you sound pretty bad.
Quote
He will say you stole it from cgminer
I point out the simple fact that anyone who uses cgminer in their firmware must provide source code.
I'm not sure why you support these people who violate the cgminer license.
Doesn't look good for you at all, even though you continue to do it.

The 'apollo' didn't use cgminer. That's obvious, and I've never claimed they did.
Please stop making repeated false accusations about me.
No doubt you enjoy the fact that you have a following of people who will listen to your false accusations, but please stop it.