First of all.  Your quoting skills suck.

You need to go to quoting school for the basics.. and probably use the preview button to verify how your quotes are showing on the screen before you post.

I tried to fix your quotes.. but its a bit confusing for me, too.. so I might have not adequately clarified what you had already screwed up.


I did not blanketly agree about any of your seemingly complicated approach, and it appears ripe for dangers that I already contextualized in my earlier response.

of course, for you particularly, the approach might work in order to satisfy your desires to dabble and attempt to beat the DCA averages.. so I don't have any problem with trying to see if you might be capable of accomplishing that on a consistent and regular basis, even if it seems to be a bit of a fools errand.


You are coming off as a disingenuine fuck if you are clipping my quotes, because I am not blanketly agreeing to your complexity, but I may well be agreeing that you could give your complexity a try to see if you can accomplish consistent returns.. including doing it over a whole cycle.. perhaps.. or at least saying why your doing it in one part of the cycle makes more sense than doing it in the other part of the cycle.


 Again.  context.  I did not give any blanket agreements to what appears likely to be nonsense, but it may just fit your personality or whatever.  Good luck to your wife.. she's the one that likely needs it more.


Getting old, Copetech.


You should not conclude otherwise in terms of anyone here actually caring about you.


If you are reading and quoting what I say out of context, then there is ONLY so much that I can do in order to save you from yourself... in other words, to the extent that you are genuine, you likely do not want to be saved from yourself.  I am having my doubts about whether you are even going to try the systems that you are proposing or to attempt to measure and learn from what you are saying.. you seem to be lacking in discipline, focus and even willingness to sufficiently tether yourself to real facts rather than what you wished the facts were.

For example, sometimes if you tweak some kind of seemingly small part of a system because you believe that you are smarter, but you don't even realize that you are tweaking it or what it was for, then you put yourself in way greater danger than if you were merely attempting to be strategic and purposeful about your tweaks in order to try to learn from them.   

You seem to have way too many areas that you want to tweak and then gloss over the whole matter, which comes off as reckless and gambling, so I really do no have high hopes for your being able to even match DCAing returns over a long period of time, even if you may well be able to match and exceed them in the short term (whether you lie in your reporting or not would be another question.  Gamblers like to lie because they will only selectively report which portions that they want rather than really attempting to grapple with the good, bad and the ugly).


This is a public thread, so sometimes it can be helpful to attempt to clarify some matters... even if you might be appearing like you are devolving more and more into a potential lost cause.