We requested RugDoc to re-evaluate the rating for Dollaremon


———Our counterargument to RugDoc—————–

I am one of the Dollaremon team members.
Thank you for posting about our project on your site.
We may have misunderstood you because of our lack of explanation, so I will explain them in order.
Also, I’m very sorry that you couldn’t contact the TG administrator.

1) but APR’s are actually 40% lower than stated,

It has been corrected. please confirm
Reference: https://twitter.com/Dollaremon1/status/1402856299583270915?s=20

2) plus the deposit fees are not very obvious for the user

We specify Fee when depositing

Also, the document has been corrected.
http://Https://dollaremon.com/fees/

We are working to display it at the top of each page
https://money-pocket.dollaremon.fi/farms
https://money-pocket.dollaremon.fi/pools

3) Uranium fork with unverified LP’s, and considering that’s where they were exploited for 53M,

Regarding unverified LP, we have at least Techrate verification completed

About Audit
http://Https://dollaremon.com/audits/
Please refer to

We started development after uranium was hacked, and Dollaremon is not a simple uranium fork.
Since the problematic part of uranium is corrected by the pancake program, it is a system with a hybrid configuration of uranium and pancake.

4) Admin in their TG ignored request to verify.
I must sincerely apologize. We are a very small team and we cannot have managers at TG 24 hours a day.
We have prepared a form so that we can respond at any time, so we would be grateful if you could ask a question from here.

http://Https://dollaremon.com/contact/

5) their UI tricks you into thinking it doesn’t show deposit fees, but most pairs have high deposit fees currently, capped at 10%.

Please refer to 2 for fees

If you have any questions, please ask here

http://Https://dollaremon.com/contact/

Thank you