It's true, but it won't stop as long as Craig Wright continues to fuck the judicial system, citing the fact that these or those lawsuits are not related to each other, (therefore, facts not relevant to the case are not subject to proof). In addition, facts known to the parties, but not known to the court, should be subject to proof, but due to the fact that Cobra refused to de-anonymize his identity, Craig's lawyers received a one-sided carte blanche to add facts from past court cases without conflicting content.

The court also makes logical mistakes, including a hasty generalization, which, as far as I understand, was made when Craig's statement was unilaterally added to the case, a statement in which he classifies Bitcoin as an altcoin. This is the highlight of the judicial system ... the facts presented unilaterally are added to the case "as pertaining to the circumstances", and all other facts are discarded "as conflicting with the circumstances of the case".

One way or another, probably the easiest and at the same time the most difficult way to protect bitcoin from Craig is a class-action counterclaim initiated by representatives of the Bitcoin industry and not by Cobra, (the purpose of which will be to protect the public interest). So, one litigation can not only once and for all get rid of the attacks of this idiot, but prevent all future similar precedents. I mean that the court decision in this case will apply even to those subjects who did not know about the existence of such proceedings, (everyone who belongs to this BTC group by definition).