Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
JayJuanGee
on 02/07/2021, 18:32:00 UTC
Say it one more time....(in S. Jackson's voice)  Cheesy

...even if it's a bit awkward to read in a pump thread.


who's pumping?

My mistake, "HODL thread" then? Reading negative statements about greed was the surprising part.

Before you can reach HODL status, you have to get to an adequate BTC accumulation level, which surely can take a decent amount of time for guys who are not already coming into BTC as already existing millionaires or some other variation of high net-worth individuals.

I understand that some guys like to describe some of their situations in kind of "baller" scenarios, but probably an assumption should be that not too many of us are already coming to this thread with an already existing baller status or even quasi-baller status.

Even a guy or gal who comes here with an already existing investment portfolio of something like $100k, might well be well pressed to get to fuck you status in 15 years of BTC investing and accumulating because so many times mistakes can be made along the way, and really seems to be the exception rather than the rule for mistakes NOT to be made - even assuming that some of us might be willing to share some of the outlines of our mistakes, but not too many of us would be able to share the specifics of our mistakes- especially if sometimes they might rise to the level of something approaching mindrust's mistake, and we might want to be stubborn in public and even show more how difficult it can sometimes be to save peeps from their lil selfies.

Another mental mistake seems to be that almost everyone comes into bitcoin believing that they are "too late," so when any of us start to explain to the newbie that I believe that you should try to do x, y and z because I have found those to be amongst the best of strategies, including attempting to account for my various mistakes along the way.  Understandably, the newbie still might want to "improve upon" the shared system because he believes that there is some kind of rush for him to catch up or some other dumbass bullshit about bitcoin no longer having sufficient pumpamentals in order for the similar  x, y and z approach to work. .and gosh the truth of the matter still remains that even newbies coming into bitcoin have a very asymmetrical bet staring them in the face - and can relatively easily get caught up in some kind of an inferior practice rather than just figuring out their BTC accumulation targets and tailoring their BTC accumulation plan to involve various kinds of lump sum investing, DCA and buying on dips in order to make progress towards having a sufficiently assertive preparation for the possibility of UPpity, even though UPpity is not guaranteed in the short term or the long term, but merely has decent chances (likely better than anything else.. but whatever.. not guaranteed, for sure).

In any event, my point is that buying and accumulating BTC may well be a strategy that persists for a decently long period of time for a large number of us thread participants - even if some of us are further on the road than others in terms of reaching our BTC accumulation goals, whether that be 0.21BTC or some other amount that works for our lil selfies.

Sometimes I think how peaceful the crypto space would have been if there were no altcoins.
Am i the only one thinking like this?

I think Alts are great, they make you realize how good Bitcoin really is.



If only alts remained to be named anything else other than Bitcoin, I think they'll be fine and we would all know they are separate. It's the alts that make a claim to be Bitcoin, or have Bitcoin somewhere in their name that causes issues.

At least with alts called Litecoin or Ethereum, you know it's a different coin... But if it's trying to say "we are the fake bitcoin, or the true bitcoin, or the cash bitcoin, or weather bitcoin (where we store the atmosphere in the blockchain) ..." ... it can get confusing. Maybe that's intentional, I dunno. For awhile it seemed like it was.

Fuck that nonsense, Dabs.  Trying to give various shitcoins "a break" or suggesting that there is some kind of hierarchy of less bad shitcoins... and there is no need to give any shitcoin an inch.. there is not one that deserves an inch.. especially in this thread and especially because we should appreciate the slippery slope nature of giving even an inch (or is it an iota?)

Doesn't matter if they say that they are not bitcoin.. .Litecoin and Ethereum are still variations of scams that are printing their own money.. and surely ethereum has more smoke and mirrors complicated bullshit that facilitate further scams and ponzi schemes to be built on top of it and trying to appear as something legit when it is just layer and layer of complication and likley nothingness .. as compared with litecoin.. which is merely a lighter version of nothingness.  In any event, I doubt that litecoin should be getting any kind of free pass in terms of NOT printing their own coins and failing and/refusing to peg their lil selfies to bitcoin..  sure has worked out well for Charlie Lee, who even claims to be a bitcoin maximalist.. is this a kind of speaking out of both sides of your mouth while laughing your way down to the bank?