Someone signed this message from 100 addresses with BTC mined in 2009:
Yes I know about this and it proved he’s indeed Faketoshi.
I’m just wondering how these people like CoinGeek guy and many others ignored this. And how court did not ask him to prove himself first Satoshi then claim the whitepaper.
Is he giving shares of BSV to all of them? Or we talking about deep pockets?
Or ignorant judges, with no Bitcoin defense team to educate them.
Failing to sign a message using Satoshi's addresses should be sufficient proof he's Faketoshi, and thus can overturn the recent court case, no?