--snip--
So if every proof can be hacked or faked daniel is allowed to keep MY money for himself ?
So even after all proofs everything FUCKKK the EMAIL make him send the Coins back where it CAME FROM
what is the next excuse "maybe the wallet got hacked better daniel keep the money for himself" WTFFFF ?
I don't think anybody said that it was ok for Bustabit to keep your funds for themselfs...
Look at it from their side: you're making a claim whilst providing proof that's >90% conclusive. What if they just gave you account access with 90% proof without proper investigation and it turns out >90% proof wasn't enough and you were a hacker after all.
What if the real owner popped up in a week or so and gave 100% conclusive proof (in the form of a signed message). Would the owner giving 100% conclusive proof be happy if Daniel accepted 90% proof and gave the real owner's money to a hacker?
By the way: sending money back to the address whose funds were used is not a good idear... What if you were using a non-custodial wallet and had no access to that address?