I did understand you but like i said, explained and proofed this case is different.
I wrote DEVANS yesterday 30 MINUTES AFTER i create and deposit the account about my problem !
I wrote DEVANS yesterday 30 MINUTES AFTER i create and deposit the account about my problem !
Heh. Why would the time matter? The policies exist for a reason.
Reminds me of when I used to run a site, I once I bent the rules for someone because it was "obviously" them (same computer, same ip address, minutes after creating the account, etc.) and as soon as I did that, they emailed me on another email address claiming that they were hacked by their brother using the same shared computer. Since I was the idiot for bending the rules, and had no way to know if it really was a "brother" hacking them on the "shared computer" or not, I gave them the full account balance as compensation (1 btc at the time).
A good reminder of why we can't have nice things, and why rules are not broken.
Quote
So you just Ignore the Fact that i Proofed its my wallet where the Bitcoins came from ?
There's no established standard for proofing it's your wallet like that. First of all, you'd need to sign a message from the funding address(es), not send another transaction. Secondly, just because you funded the account doesn't mean it's your account.
Quote
Im just alergic to scam behaviour ! then even trying to hide it behind it "account security"
where is the good support ?
Why is noone checking the proofs ?
I would assume your scam allergy would make you appreciate account security taken seriously. But either way, I don't see how it matters. where is the good support ?
Why is noone checking the proofs ?
Quote
I guess we know the answer !because like RH said on bustabit are millions of dollars probably alot on old accs as well by making the Email verification those ppl might not be able to login because they maybe entered random email just like me yesterday and saved just the Login Credentials !! !!
Yeah, that's totally it.
I know you sold the website to Daniel long ago, but with that level of login abuse, wouldn't it make sense to send a confirmation email on a successful login from a new IP address? That should severely reduce the number of successful break-ins since, as you said, email accounts are usually sealed off.
I am pretty sure it does, doesn't it?