I dont have anything to add, you guys/gals are very knowledgable in the historical
events surrounding Satoshi, related topics like Bitcoin.org and various people.
While I find everything surrounding Faketoshi kindof stressful/annoying its also very intriguing,
should I be guilty of that?
Same.

I am addicted to this story, at least this week.
I would like to read a book written by those who are more knowledgeable on the subject.
Where people put their wealth is taken much more seriously than a website. Even a takeover were succesful, crypto and bitcoin would survive. The network has been established as a protocol for too long. It's international. It is its own prior art and MIT 2 license. It has industry leaders, history, and wealth. A website has potential to confuse new people, but not really, and not for long. A lost website is like software rot, which is an (often unfortunate) nuisance; there are many different )and open source) wallets that access the protocol. Bitcoin is decentralised in more than its protocol.