>>
>Comparing investors with the soldiers seems stupid idea,
Compare investment to war
Compare investor to soldier
Compare invested asset to ammunition/gun/weapon

>Let's talk about the soldier's high risk, you are saying that the soldiers are not getting any returns for their risk
the return solider get from war is victory, it’s a very sweet return, think of all the sweat and blood that pave the way for peace, isn’t it well worth it?

>but the actual return is you are sitting in your home and talking about this because of someone is taking risk to save their borders. If no one is ready to become soldier then imagine how you are life is going to be!
Here we goes again, yup, security is at risk too, fortunately someone else is taking the risk, no doubt without soldier there won’t be peace.

>>
>Your opinion is the same as someone who has never enjoyed a decent return,
someone who has never enjoyed a decent return! Well said, under current circumstances, no one can think of get rich quick, I don’t think there is anyone who actually become rich following the investing rules, remember all the billionaires teach you a bunch of rules to follow? I doubt you have forgotten all of them! I think they tell you to invest into stock market to get rich, why aren’t you invested in stock? Why aren’t you quit crypto?

>either because you have not tried at all or have experienced major failures.
it definitely got the vibes of a financial ruin.

>Therefore, in business all individuals must be soldiers for themselves with all their intelligence and responsibility.
I’m intrigued by someone who actually believe business is about taking huge risk. Btw most successful business starts from nothing to build into conglomerate today. Doesn’t bitcoin start off from zero? Don’t be the soldier, they’re risky.

>>
>do not understand about the risk you mean, do you mean millions of dollars of wealth invested is not a risk at all?
Want to define risk in plain text??
Covid virus is very high risk and need to resort to martial laws, bitcoin is risk to some people, gold is risk to some people, chemicals inside talcum is carcinogenic risk, Monsanto is gmo risk... what is risk? It’s everything!
Someone get hurt, hence it’s risk, yup, even a drawn character that resemble a criminal can be risk, gta v is a risk too, it’s risky to children, and someone get hurt or killed in that risk...!

>Then, who are the elites in investment/trading that rule you? You enter, you are the sole controller and in full charge of your assets. If you think of popes as elite and retailers with a thousand different minds are warriors, it's impossible for popes to rule retailers all at once.
A casino has total control of their win/loss rate, gamblers who take risk in the casino, can never stand a chance to beat the casino into total loss. The elite, being the casino king pin, has absolute total control to every plebs who place their bet in their casino, it’s not a fairy tale, the casino theory has been proven over and over again, casino can’t never lose no matter how genius competent the gamblers are, all of them, even in a huge team would loss to the casino.

>>
OP, did you realize your post was super repetitive?  This is what I'd call a bloated shitpost that's long but basically says nothing. 
Yup, you want to get rid of risk? Everybody want to get rid of risk in their life? Can you get rid of risk? Is it even possible to get rid of risk? Risk is probably the highly bloated shitpost ever yet nobody can get rid of risk! Funny?

>I was going to write something about the topic itself, but it's blatantly false on its face that high risk is only for the young--and you didn't even define "young". 
Young is not age specified. For animal, their young age are much deviated. For a turtle, 200 year old can be a young turtle. For whales, 100 year old is a young whale. For human? Young human? When we construct a sentence, “the morning is young.” We do not specify the age, what we are trying to describe is, “it’s early in the morning.” Young and naive guy refer to the people who get into investment without any basic knowledge, they’re as young as apprentice, as young as a toddler in the investment, they have no idea of the entire corrupted practices in the investing industries. Indeed as young as clueless newbie who are readily to be slaughtered in the stock trading.

>To you it could mean people in their teens or 20s, but to me it could be anyone up to 45 years old.  And aside from all that, there are big risk takers of all age categories....so I'm not sure why you started this thread, but my guess is it's a merit-grab attempt. 
Young and naive, all of you.

>Big fail.
not sure if it’s satire.