With the increasing influence of Bitcoin in the world, more and more people are supporting and approving Bitcoin. Few mainstream media can directly say that Bitcoin is a scam. However, there are still many opinions saying that Bitcoin is a bubble, and this bubble will eventually burst. Many mainstream economists hold this view. They always oppose Bitcoin for different reasons. Economists are scholars who study economics. They have knowledge and social status far beyond ordinary people. Logically speaking, they should be more able to see the value contained in Bitcoin. Why are some economists always opposed to Bitcoin?
I think it's just a trick so economists can buy bitcoin at a cheaper price. In recent years we can see that bitcoin has experienced a very high price increase compared to gold. From the fact that we have seen that bitcoin is very promising for its holders if they are willing to be patient to hold bitcoin until the price rises very high. Even though the price of bitcoin has decreased very far but at some point the price of bitcoin will definitely rise higher and it will definitely happen, so don't be disappointed if the price of bitcoin has decreased.