Re: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed

Plagiarism.
User: kxwhakexk
Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/

Introductory part for comparison

Quote from: kxwhalexk on July 15, 2021, 03:37:40 AM

In August 1991, NIST (Nation Institute of Standards and Technology) proposed a digital signature algorithm (DSA) for use in their digital signature standard (DSS). DSA is an algorithm, and DSS is a standard. The standard uses algorithms, algorithms are part of the standard.

But NIST’s announcement has caused a lot of condemnation, and these condemnations are more political than academic. Many large software companies that have obtained the RSA algorithm patent license have also against DSS. They have invested a lot of money to implement the RSA algorithm. Of course, they do not want these funds to be lost in vain.

[...]

I am not a native English speaker. If I have logic errors, grammar and vocabulary errors, please help me to correct them. Thank you.

The source

Quote from: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/

In August 1991, NIST (Nation Institute of Standards and Technology) proposed the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) for their Digital Signature Standard (DSS).

DSA is an algorithm and DSS is a standard. The standard uses algorithms, and the algorithm is part of the standard.

But the NIST announcement has caused a lot of condemnation, and these condemnations are more political than academic. Many large software companies that have obtained patent licenses for the RSA algorithm have also stood up against DSS. They have invested a lot of money to implement the RSA algorithm, and they certainly don't want these funds to be lost.

I will say in the words of pooya87 "It is not your English, there are fundamental flaws in what you explain. Maybe you should avoid trying to explain to others things you don't fully understand yourself", especially when the user is trying to explain something to someone without specifying a link to the source. I want to add that I probably would not have paid attention to this post if I had not seen the link to it in the thread ^{[self-moderated / Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source].}