There may be one or two sentences in the article that are similar to the article on which day. These are the knowledge points I have gained through learning and share with you. I don't think the forum does not have this kind of inclusiveness. A lot of the content published by everyone is I summarized after studying, according to this kind of words, according to this kind of standard, then who dares to speak? Who dares to share? I just tell you what I know, if someone does not evaluate the content, I have to go word by word Compare and where the article is the same, then I am really sad. Very sad.
Originally, after publishing yesterday, I thought that a lot of people would praise me today, but it turned out...
Let me say it again, I didn't plagiarize, I didn't plagiarize, have you ever seen that the sentences copied by others are not smooth? I really want to show you my manuscript.
Look, I don't care, you don't have to convince me of anything. It's your account and your future (if you want to call it that) on Bitcointalk. I am telling you based on experience what happens to people who fail to cite the sources they used. Now, it's up to you to decide how you want to proceed. You mentioned some kind of manuscript. If you used that manuscript to make this thread, you should cite the name and author of it.
Here is an example of what I was talking about yesterday. My opinion is that this could not have happened by accident.
https://i.imgur.com/o9smsT2.pngLink to full-size imageDon't make the mistake of thinking if you add links to sources that you used when creating a thread, it ultimately makes your thread be of lower quality or something like that. It doesn't.
Thank you very much for your suggestions, the manuscript I am talking about is a manuscript written by myself.
I don't know why I always feel that the forum has a kind of discrimination against newcomers. I am indeed a newbie in the forum, but I am not a newbie to Bitcoin. I have been participating in DEX trading since the beginning of DEX. I have experienced it myself, but there may be one or two of them that I saw when I read some materials. I have an impression in my mind. It may be the sentence you drew, but the document you sent me. I haven't seen it before.
In addition, I saw that my own post was said to have been plagiarized, and I was very angry, so I may not be able to control my emotions, and I will say sorry to you.
Is the content I summarized really worthless? Why don't you comment on my value? If I did something wrong, you can criticize it, but is there anything I did well? Shouldn’t you praise me for doing well? Is it because of the mistakes of every word that I deny all my efforts?
