Let's forget for a minute the evidence posted demonstrating that you lied to the police. Let's ignore your arbiter, as is patent that you retain access to that money. Your post confirms it.
The OP is no longer a Rock Trading customer, thus AML rules don't apply and you don't have any right to ask for identity verification. The FAQ you removed say that you never had.
The OP posted plenty of evidence that he is the owner of the money and this conflict already has several years. You are the only one denying it.
Is there other evidence you could possible invent to release his money?
What if the OP is not the account owner?
It would be very easy to prove it but
he can't.... (PS the account owner is a woman)
The Rock Trading Exchange's representative after years of excuses and lies and all the evidence posted is still claiming that the OP didn't prove that he is the owner of the blocked money.
This appears just another excuse to appropriate the money. But I can be proven wrong.
I'm waiting to know what specific evidence is lacking.
I have a free signature. I'm hoping it won't be needed to use this thread with a nasty comment as signature to solve this mess.