Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 1XBIT.COM ᐉ 3 BTC Lottery ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC
by
Erdogan
on 25/07/2021, 07:48:13 UTC
mainly that support is much more active and responds almost immediately - it is a huge progress. Also, many issues have been resolved that have not been touched in months - that is also a huge improvement for me.
Their support needs to stay active if they wish to continue earning money by scamming gamblers.

When the support was not active, everyone shouted loudly that it was unacceptable! Now, when support is very active, it is even worse. Could you please make up your mind and tell me which option is better - when support is active or not active?

Also, which issues have been resolved exactly? ... Care to point them out?


Sure:

Quote
1) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5284893.0 account restored, ~1 eth on balance
2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1775566.0 account restored, ~4.3 btc on balance
3) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5278185.0 account restored, ~10 mbtc on balance
4-5) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg55695609#msg55695609 2 cases were solved, bleedrulez (0,25 btc) + 2kevin2

some cases with deposits returned, but accounts still closed:
1) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56124862#msg56124862
2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277227.0 account closed, ~20 eth of deposits returned
3-4) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg55781599#msg55781599 2 cases, jennyoller + Holen88
5) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg55695604#msg55695604 ~63 mbtc
6) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56298205#msg56298205
7) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56379357#msg56379357
8') https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56419159#msg56419159
9) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56479980#msg56479980
10) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56532562#msg56532562
11) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266815.msg56630760#msg56630760
12) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56691669#msg56691669
13) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56821272#msg56821272
14) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56888250#msg56888250
15) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg56897450#msg56897450
16) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg57001228#msg57001228
17) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg57095997#msg57095997



I Post this not to support any of 1xbit position because i am still believe that they are responsible in many issues of Money claims and that must be settled , though i also understand the desperation of some account in having opportunity gaining after their ruined reputations.
But what I still holding to is that One day everything or at least majority of the claims will be answered and settled in right manner and not just by Denying and using the So called Violation of TOS in which we all knew that Many gambling site is using to hide their Main intention to take advantage of the situation.
Anyway if what will come to the future? I hope you all guys Knows what you are doing and Knows what the consequences are because remember that All the things we do will always reflect in our future.

Probably all casinos, and maybe even all companies in the world, use ToS to protect themselves.
Of course, everyone (except the competition) want 1xBit to clarify all cases and rebuild its reputation.



Don't deny it, you are a big Shill. You are promoting a company that we all know here is scam.
Quoted from the dictionary

Quote
Shill
1. noun Someone who promotes or endorses some product, service, event, etc., in an extravagant, misleading, or insincere manner in return for money or some other self-interest. Originally referred to someone who poses as a satisfied customer in order to lure other people into engaging in a swindle or con


Referring to the bold part of the quote - I have never played 1xBit or pose as a satisfied player. I try to be objective in all my statements.

If you claim that I am shill because I wear a signature, then I will agree with you, but only if you admit that you and everyone who wears signature are shills.
There's a huge difference. I am glad you highlighted the last sentence, but you intentionally ignored the last bits of the sentence I have highlighted in red. Guilty, huh?


Please stop manipulating and selecting fragments out of context. It is clearly written that it is someone who pretends to be a satisfied customer. I'm not doing it so I can't be called shill and it's clear so don't pretend you don't know what's going on.