In the recommendation he gave RainbowKun a high rating, saying that he contributed to the effective discussion of Bitcointalk, and that he put in enough effort that he deserves more merit. But it is clear that RainbowKUN current merit is not matched by his current contributions to the forum.
His threads could not go unnoticed given their number in the Bitcoin Discussion board, so anyone who did not ignore that board could reward him if he thought he deserved it. Personally, I am not in favor of merit sources being influenced in this way, but that is something that is not against the rules of the forum.
RainbowKun is a rising star of BitcoinTalk.
If you think so, but given the topics he chooses and the writing style and the interaction he encourages - I don't see that too many active users are thrilled with the way you perceive it.
...he posted 24 separate threads in 28 days in July, which is close to one per day. In addition, each of his articles is more than 500 words, which is an amazing output of creation, which also shows his contribution to our forum knowledge.
I read almost every one of his articles, though in many cases I didn't really understand what he was saying.
You mostly don't understand what he's talking about, but you're fascinated by how much content he can produce in a short amount of time. This is a bit strange though, as the quality does not come from the walls of the text and the number of threads.
I have nothing against the user in question so that someone would not misunderstand me. I can agree with ETFbitcoin that I have read some of his posts, but in general, I am not too interested in such discussions.