Can you perhaps present something simpler and summarized (yet not as vague as the summary on your second post) to help us decide if we're interested on throwing ourselves into reading that whole whitepaper you put as your introduction post?
We can probably start with what's the app about.
Absolutely. I apologize, a more concise summary of the project is this:
1. Allowing users to tokenized their intellectual property as NFTs.
2. These intellectual property tokens (IPTs) can have the ownership fractionalized.
3. IPT Ownership (IPTO) can be leveraged in order to form business partnerships with users who have the hard/technical skills to actualize the project.
4. These decentralized entrepreneurial ventures (DEVs) are partnerships governed by DAOs.
5. DEVs can also leverage IPTO in order to raise funding for their project.
What problem am I addressing?It may seem simple, but if you go around asking people if they've ever had a great idea for something (
anything) that they never did anything with because they didn't have the skills and/or resources to make it real, an overwhelming majority will reply in the affirmative. InvArch aims to bridge the gap between great ideas and those who have the abilities to make them real, by forming business partnerships between the actors of the process.
Point number 1 and 2 raises my interest and I'd like to know more if you don't mind me probing. For point number 1, wasn't this model already available and offered by a lot of defi/nft projects? Or is there something else that you offered that makes you different?
And for number 2, isn't it quite contradictive? The point of NFT and what's so special about it to set it aside from the previous crypto model (where everything can be sold in smallest fractions someone wanted to buy) was that it's indivisible. An nft should be sold as a whole and each token is unique and different from others. You propose to convert IP into an NFT, which then can be sold in fractions?