This topic is a little bit biased..
Three poll options are about possible negative qualities of the articles, whilst the other three are about how the forum or reader supposedly sucks. Where's the neutral or good options?
The title, "to see if forums really need depth knowledge", presents the assumption that these articles are comprehensive.
The poll options seem to put the blame more on the user, rather than the quality of these articles. There aren't a directly positive or directly negative poll options, like they could be if they were
"I have read these articles, and find them informative or thought inspiring"
"I have read these articles, and found them to not be interesting"
or
"The ideas are very original, and well written"
"The ideas are very original, but poorly presented"
You are right, I actually planned to add two positive options at first, but in order to avoid promotion suspicion, I only added two neutral options.
The question itself is not to discuss the quality of RainbowKUN’s posts, but to discuss whether the forum requires in-depth knowledge through this matter.
But thank you for your reminder, based on your suggestions. I might add a positive option.
At that time, we were Binance’s biggest competitor. This project is world-famous. But because of some reasons from the founder of the project, we failed in the process of competing with Binance. At the right time in the future, I will tell the story that happened that year.
So you are a big man hidden behind the novice account?
Why is my writing frequency so high? I have produced more than 20 independent articles throughout July. Because I have very limited time now.
That is to say you are developing a project? wow, will you do it on bitcointalk? Do I have the opportunity to participate in private sale or donate?
Every time I write an article, I try to put forward an independent point of view as much as possible, and then describe my thinking process of this point of view, and finally draw my conclusions.
Yes, according to my observation, many newbies now only post their own questions, and when others reply and answer them, they get no response, or even a thanks. It’s always good to have your own independent thinking.
Finally, thank you again for all your friends’ suggestions, whether it is encouraging establishment or critical suggestions, I accept them humbly. Because of continuous communication with everyone, my own cognitive level has also improved significantly. This is the greatest wealth that these writings have brought to me. Thanks again!
Every time I write an article, I try to put forward an independent point of view as much as possible, and then describe my thinking process of this point of view, and finally draw my conclusions.
Looking forward to your new article.