Post
Topic
Board Legal
Re: Mt.Gox Multi-plaintiff Suit
by
smoothie
on 18/03/2014, 07:12:19 UTC

I never supported MtGox
Yes, you did:

Quote from: smoothie on February 09, 2014, 12:57:40 PM
+1 Mr. Sturle lacks logic when it comes to customers being fucked over in all of MTGOX's short comings. And myself being also called an idiot by him shows his lack of understanding of what customers should be able to do.
I can fully understand the frustration of people who can't get to their money.  Claiming they don't have the BTC, and asking for total irresponsible behaviour to "prove" they have the BTC, is 100% idiocy.

We all know that this technical glitch has all the signs of a technical glitch, and absolutely no signs of MtGox being out of BTC.  In fact they filled up their hot wallet several times during last week, as you could see by withdrawals suddenly working well for a short while, using very old inputs, until they started failing because the old spent inputs came back on top of the list (sorted by age).  I took the opportunity to withdraw just after refill, and got myself a new round of profit by buying MtGox BTC at a discount with BTC I withdrew from MtGox.  You will know they are going to refill within 2 hours of withdrawals to external addresses starting to fail with "invalid address".  (Withdrawal to MtGox deposit addresses still work when the hot wallet is empty.)

You are obviously not a technical or scientific person.  You rely on belief and rumour instead of facts and logic.  I am a technical person.  I dig into the real matters, investigating what holds water and what is just empty rumours.  That's why I am right every time.

Lol and I was made out to be the "idiot" yet my call was spot on (mtgox being insolvent).

And his presumption of me not being a technical person is funny as I have a technical background.

I do speak from experience. And the way I knew mtgox was insolvent was from a of the signs they gave the public over the past 8 to 9 months. It wouldn't be the first insolvent business I've spotted.

Sturle can't admit he was wrong and that his shilling for gox was for financial gain at the expense of others.