Both sides have said their part but my opinion is that, bithobo might be the one who doesn't want to pay hauzenberg the withdrawal. Why did I say this?. First, hauzenberg deposited and play as hauzenberg said and won then process a withdrawal of the btc then bithobo sent an email stating that hauzenberg is suspicious and then bet history is gone. It is very much like a cover up to avoid paying the gambler by using the issue of server secret being exposed. I'm guessing that the next bithobo will reply might prove that hauzenberg did cheat or take advantage of a bug. I don't defend both sides so let's wait for both and see what they will say. Let's wait for bithobo to prove the suspension on hauzenberg for cheating.
Bithobo should resolve this issue by providing proof that hauzenberg really did cheat or violate any rules or take advantage of a bug if really wanted to run a legit gambling site.
I already replied there in the thread to this big words. No, I did not found a bug. I did not found server secret. I did not known result before game.
you winning almost 100% of the all the bets you placed - it is because my win chance was around 86% if my calculations are correct and I only placed around 30 bets if I remember correctly. Just to try site. And I didn't won every times and you agree with that.
during your long session - this is lie.
I'm high roller, I just wanted to see how your site is because I like non-standard type of games. Please proceed with my withdrawal or refund my deposit and that will be all from me.
This is why I never deposit any funds on a site that I am not sure if it is trusted or not and once it is proven to be trusted then i'll deposit but for fun and wasting bored time only.