If I were to become a moderator of the P&S sub, I would not moderate as Twitter does, but rather would moderate as a neutral party "down the middle". I would continue to express my opinion but would encourage everyone, regardless of their opinion to post their opinions and encourage everyone to have a well-reasoned debate with those they disagree with. I would split topics as they go off topic, would remind people to remain on-topic, and would make well-reasoned counterpoints when someone makes an argument I disagre with, in order to allow for others to debate
You're misusing the trust system against users for expressing opinions different from yours. I don't think you would have any qualms about misusing a moderator's position.
| | Cnut237 | | 2020-08-31 | | Reference | | Repeating left-wing propiganda. Take anything this person says with a grain of salt. |
| | Juggy777 | | 2020-08-31 | | Reference | | Repeating left-wing propiganda, take anything this person says with a grain of salt |
Once again, and in view of what he says, I will agree with suchmoon, and PrimeNumber7 will not be able to say that I repeat left-wing propaganda.
The problem is that we all like to think we are more objective and unbiased than we are.
Leaving that feedback to Cnut237 is anything you want but unbiased, PrimeNumber7. I with Cnut237 usually have differing opinions, after debating sometimes we come to common ground and sometimes we don't. Precisely on the issue of structural racism I disagree with him. For me it is much less than what is painted, but to say that he simply repeats left-wing propaganda when Cnut237 is a person who always defends with detailed arguments what he says is completely misrepresentative. With that background, I don't trust you to do a good job as a moderator.