Your language and comprehension coupled with your over-confidence makes it nearly impossible to have a debate but we try to be as open to ideas on this forum as possible.
It seems that the most confident person is you.You are a “definition king”.Let me enumerate the definition you have made：
- 1.just indicative of your communist background
- 2.CCP puppet
- 3.Dear CCP representative
- 4.CCP apologists
It seems that you have also gone on to cry about discrimination in Meta, so I'd like to convince you that none of this is about discriminating against you as an individual but about the philosophy you are trying to propagate.
I don’t know what your definition of cry about discrimination is. I just simply ask whether there is discrimination. To explain this objectively, do you understand it as cry?
You will never convince the free people of the world, much less bitcoiners, that an optimal method of scoial governance needs an over-arching central authority "managing" the best for everyone else.
Which government in the world is not a central authority? This is not what I said, this is what the history of mankind has told us for thousands of years. Those countries or groups that have centralized power have all perished in the course of history.
Your reply to my point about idiomatic usage of "All people are free to vote and express" in context of democracies just shows that your brain is unable to even comprehend democracy. Like i said earlier, lets leave it at that. You have already shown your true colors with expressions like "Stupid people with their stupid votes" etc., so there really is no need to elaborate on that. I will still address your typical CCP tactic of trying to target democracies for their internal problems. You clearly are up to date with your handbook of "talking points" with various nationalities. If its India, talk about Ganges and population and toilets. If its USA, talk about racism and BLM riots and Iraq.
You think of my response to you as a kind of "manual". Your mind is imprisoned. Have you not noticed it yet? The opinions expressed by active users on the forum are understood by you as a "manual". When I talk about the problems of your country, if you only regard these problems as my strategy to attack you, do these problems no longer exist?
Still, because you insist, you should know that you have heard about above issues because the leadership has actually tried to address them and they are making considerable progress. I said in my very first post that Democracies aren't perfect and there are times when we ourselves jostle with the fact that decision-making can be so cumbersome and implementation can often be so far away from actual plans. Just look at the ongoing twists and turns in the US Senate about the crypto bill. A lot depends on the leadership at various levels and people get to choose depending on their performance. Sure the process can be slow.