Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Everything I posted above is a fact. It’s all public data anyone can research. 
If you don't believe those returns just wait until I locate the GLBSE data.
I’m not sure which part is under dispute that has brought on the hate…that you couldn’t buy 649 NastyMining shares on the GLBSE for $1000 originally, that they aren’t selling for >$30 per seat currently, or that they aren’t holding >$1900 per seat in untouched distributions now, but that’s all very easily verifiable and the number will go up when the GLBSE distribution data is located (and even more if you factor in the forks).
If you don't believe those returns just wait until I locate the GLBSE data.
I’m not sure which part is under dispute that has brought on the hate…that you couldn’t buy 649 NastyMining shares on the GLBSE for $1000 originally, that they aren’t selling for >$30 per seat currently, or that they aren’t holding >$1900 per seat in untouched distributions now, but that’s all very easily verifiable and the number will go up when the GLBSE distribution data is located (and even more if you factor in the forks).
Oh my..... You may well end up getting your posts removed from this thread OgNasty.. not a common feat to accomplish to have posts removed from the WO thread, but shilling and trolling are areas that have been historically nipped in the bud.
Of course, you are not merely shilling your product, you are attempting to pump your reputation too.. which also seems a strange thing to be attempting to do in these here parts.
I am not sure if anyone reported you yet, but it seems to be getting beyond tolerance levels of what we tend to do here.. you are acting like a newbie with such nonsense pumpening talk.
Maybe you cannot help yourself?
How's your short going PMcoiner?
What short? Im hodling.
Well good thing that you had your "insightful" DOWNity theory hedged.
It was a hypothesis. A theory has a lot of work put in. I just pulled a chart out of my ass and asked if the past data similiarity looked spooky.
Well that question was already answered. In essence, the data that you had shown did not look spooky nor similar (based on other underlying concepts in bitcoinlandia.. including the various BTC prediction models that should have allowed you to reasonably conclude that we not be in 2018 at this here time), but you argued about it anyhow...hahahaha