You have proven this, and your record is straight about this and I believe some other merit sources share in your ideology. I admit that the ability to notice a quality post is easy and everyone can do so, but the ability to define the future of a newbie or a lower ranking member needs a little of psychology, since there is not ample statistics (yardstick) to measure.


But every job has specifications and/or KPI, which is the bases of the job. Everyone's approach should not deviate extensively from the job specifications. This might be far from reality if it's an unmonitored work without pay. To the best of my knowledge, the merit system is working well, I am also a testimony, but my concern was when I saw data showing 50% merit allocation to Legendaries.