Everyone has different criteria for assessing projects.
The only difference is that my and the OP's average experience is much more in this sector than any other newbie starting with crypto at this time.

So what do you think about projects that lack support, partnerships and roadmaps?
Firstly the idea of these projects is mistaken. Hence any project made in this sector to be linked to a crypto is a fake one running only on some vaporware and attempting to compete with the mainstream fiat markets of the same. Hence thos pictures are useless crap.
Secondly the "projects" therefore have to show off with such support/partner/roadmaps. Essentially it is all an eyewash and these "partners" are only going to act as "Advisors" because they were paid to do so. The reality is that there is a said term that advisors/partners keep their money locked in for. This is not publicly known and when the term ends, they will dump all their bags and exit because that is what they do. This leads to the market crashes in specific altcoins that happens after a few months of listing.
Majority of bamboozled newbies dont understand this because they lack prior history of stock market and IPOs and the bounty hunters will be blamed for causing a market dump and you already know the rest of the cycle.