Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC
by
nakamura12
on 26/08/2021, 19:39:55 UTC
I do agree with you when it is 1xbit, which is true that they are looking shadier everyday. However, I do not agree that everyone who wears a signature has to defend the place they carry the signature neither, I could like a place and someone else may not, I do not need to defend them though, they should defend themselves as much as they can, we are getting paid as signature carriers to post, and I can post to places that has to nothing to do with my signature and I would say that it would definitely be paid as well, so why go defend them? This guy definitely did that, I am not arguing about that, he is caring their signature and getting paid so he is defending them, not a smart move in the long run of course, but it would seem that he thinks it is good for today.

In any case, I would not defend a bad place, and I would get out of signature as soon as I get paid as well if I believe it is bad, but even if I believe it is good, I am not going to go around defending them, promote? Sure.
In 1xbit participant's case of getting negative trust have reason why they received a negative trust or negative feedback from DT. First is, 1xbit have many accusations in this forum which is enough to tell everyone one that it is not trusted and having a bad service to their users. Second, signature campaign in this forum is a promotional type. Why did I say that?. You are paid to post in any board wearing their signature which shows what site, product, projects you are advertising or promoting. There you have your answer why participants that wear 1xbit signature have negative trust or feedback.