The forum has been developing for 12 years. The early members of the forum are tired of the "naive" argument of newcomers, or we are not people of the same era, for our personality , They don’t understand or don’t like it directly. We are good at expressing, we highlight individuality, we respect the "old man", the forum you dream of is not what they want, our opinion equals our qualifications.
You got it here. "We are not people of same era". Also "The early members of the forum are tired of the naive argument or suggestions of the newcomers"
I have just tried to analyse it this way;
1. The early members are willing to help newer members grow, and it seems such gestures had been betrayed by many newcomers before. Now they are skeptical and wouldn't want to repeat such mistakes. It's a kind of transfer of aggressions playing out.
2. The system does not have a reliable means to trust It's users. It is happens like this; Theymos trusted some early comers and the early comers inturn trusted other members which gave rise to DT1 and DT2(Which I don't know what DT stands for). Assuming the forum something like KYC, the issue of trust and trust abuse would have been curtailed. So, the only means to trust I to subject one to series of accusations, some substantial and others not.
However, newcomers need to spend much time here, before they could be trusted. It does not hurt if you are not trusted, but it hurts if the few that tends to trust you begin to distrust you.
I has been dragged into a swamp, the harder you work, the more you sink
I think the best practice should be to remain calm in the swamp, a saviour might come to rescue you, however if no one comes, there would be a summer and the swamp will dry. But I will take time. Thanks!