alright, I am kinda on the forum, but I have been around.

Have you guys thought about what makes a coin that 'should be in exchanges'?
I just thought about that, and realize some coins are to be taken seriously, while Most arent.

to be, the list looks like this:

The Boss: Where he goes, we follow.
Bitcoin

The Mid Bosses: Where they are is hard-earned, don't expect too much more. (for now)
Litecoin
Dogecoin
Peercoin
Namecoin

The Try Hards: Potentials for outbreak. Depends on market's outlook.
Worldcoin
Darkcoin  <-- new add
Feathercoin

Removed:
Megacoin removed. I learned they borrowed the brand of Mega, and has nothing to do with the corp.
Quark removed. I learned they were instamined from multiple source, and lost credibility through denials despite obvious evidence.

I cannot take Ripple seriously, I mean who does.
Same with Primecoin, which I see extremely limited development, it is really there just because.
Mastercoin/NZT I also cannot take seriously, same as ripple.

While Aurora and Spain.. well, too soon?
SpainCoin doesn't even look legit to me, does it to anyone?

InfiniteCoin and Novacoin... well, it has a trading volume of a tea-spoon.
I think these two will disappear completely soon.
Bitshares (protoshares), this one has always been iffy to me.


Do you guys ingeneral agree with me?