This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.
Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?.
I'm the one who says that participants with negative trust are no longer accepted, it was only at the beginning.
What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?.
There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.
I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.
Of course, I know the current rules, because as you noticed, I am a participant in the 1xBit signature campaign. That is why I am explaining them to you.