Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members
and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.
Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.
This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.
I did not see this happened , that the supporters of Adkinsbet was removed in the second week? they gladly accepted them at first and then abandoning after their "Great Service"?
But my question is <Why does the Spreadsheet is Hidden? why not broadcast the whole set of participants now ?
anyway this does not concerns us anymore because everyone that wears 1xbit signature was being tagged accordingly. no matter if campaign participants or not.