Re: Exposing RainbowKun and His Large Alts Army. Big farm 60+ Accs !!!
If there is a bot farm, then what links it to RainbowKun? How do we not know that it is run by the very own Ratimov! Or any of the users that merited this post?? I am not suggesting any of those, but suggesting that the evidence is lacking. Suggesting that because he was merited by them is enough evidence is not sufficient. His account posted frequently. Merit sources also changed, so there was more recent merit given out, which you might expect.
Here, the majority have long understood everything, only bots do not see obvious evidence at close range, like the same Jazmin Leslie or The Ghoul, stubbornly denying the obvious. RainbowKun himself admitted that he is Chinese.
I am Kun Yuan from China,
Other cheaters on my list use Chinese services and write posts in Chinese or translate Chinese posts into English. The whole puzzle came together. With regards to you, I cannot say that you are a cheater. Otherwise, your nickname would have been on a different list. The rest of the cheaters from the list, such as RainbowKun, kxwhalexk, Jazmin Leslie, The Ghoul, etc., are 100% cheaters with many connections.
Your main argument is that RainbowKun is Chinese?
What the...
What connections?
All I see is someone who is very concerned about China, and uses that as a main argument to implicate these accounts. This is not evidence of anything on its own.
I also checked all accounts for the presence of the Chinese language, at the beginning of the posting, how many times the accounts have posting equal to the activity and how many percent of the posts he writes between 01:00 AM UTC to 11:00 AM UTC:
I analyzed all accounts for interests, posting times and style. All accounts prefer almost the same sections: Bitcoin Discussion, Economics, Meta, Politics & Society, Beginners & Help, Alternate cryptocurrencies. Which is not surprising, given that the accounts are managed by the same person, then his interests are similar. I won't say anything about his style of posts. You can compare the style of posts of the same RainbowKun and kxwhalexk yourself. Obviously, this is written by the same person.
Also, the cheater publishes most of the posts from 01:00 AM UTC to 11:00 AM UTC. If we take into account that Beijing time is +8 hours UTC, then this explains such activity, this is just the morning and the end of the day. And after 03:00 PM UTC, the user writes very rarely, as most likely he is sleeping.
Next, I presented a visual list of all accounts and their main posting locations:
I also checked all accounts for the presence of the Chinese language, at the beginning of the posting, how many times the accounts have posting equal to the activity and how many percent of the posts he writes between 01:00 AM UTC to 11:00 AM UTC:
I analyzed all accounts for interests, posting times and style. All accounts prefer almost the same sections: Bitcoin Discussion, Economics, Meta, Politics & Society, Beginners & Help, Alternate cryptocurrencies. Which is not surprising, given that the accounts are managed by the same person, then his interests are similar. I won't say anything about his style of posts. You can compare the style of posts of the same RainbowKun and kxwhalexk yourself. Obviously, this is written by the same person.
Also, the cheater publishes most of the posts from 01:00 AM UTC to 11:00 AM UTC. If we take into account that Beijing time is +8 hours UTC, then this explains such activity, this is just the morning and the end of the day. And after 03:00 PM UTC, the user writes very rarely, as most likely he is sleeping.
Next, I presented a visual list of all accounts and their main posting locations:
I also checked all accounts for the presence of the Chinese language, at the beginning of the posting, how many times the accounts have posting equal to the activity and how many percent of the posts he writes between 01:00 AM UTC to 11:00 AM UTC:
You then identified individuals who have a "posting counter is equal to the activity counter" as a main argument. This is also not an argument of anything, except that these are new accounts, unless you have other logic on what you are trying to prove.
Quote
- Fasting began on July 1, 2021. The posting counter is higher than the activity counter.
- Posting began on July 8. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on May 24. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter. Chinese language is present.
- Posting started on January 27. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on July 6. The posting counter is larger than the activity counter. There is a discussion about China.
- Posting began on July 15th. The posting counter is larger than the activity counter. There is a discussion about China.
- Posting began on December 28, 2020. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on August 4. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on July 8. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on May 24. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter. Chinese language is present.
- Posting started on January 27. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on July 6. The posting counter is larger than the activity counter. There is a discussion about China.
- Posting began on July 15th. The posting counter is larger than the activity counter. There is a discussion about China.
Because of work, I need to live in China for a period of time. I found that China is the most widely used country for mobile payment. All aspects of life are cashless. You can go out for a day without cash, you only need a mobile phone.
- Posting began on July 6. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.- Posting began on December 28, 2020. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
- Posting began on August 4. The posting counter is equal to the activity counter.
And if I'm wrong, explain to me why accounts that have a similar registration date, similar posting dates, similar dates of last activity, similar interests, a similar service for downloading pictures, Chinese in their themes, a similar overflow of merit, similar applications in my topic help for newbies? Do you seriously think that all this does not matter and that these facts of mine can easily be covered by the empty shell that you are trying to present here as a counter-argument? Do not make me laugh.
You posted registration dates of 20 accounts over the course of a year, who have recently been active within the last few weeks. What's abnormal?
Your main argument about posting activity proved that those users were in China, and you use this an an argument to discredit them.
Am I missing something?