As I've stated in the first place at p2, I know it contradicts, that's why I've suggested that the miners number needs to get lower, not inflation higher. 
So you are saying here that lower number of nodes will be better for IDNA price? Thats the oposit of what logic say. Lower amount of nodes = less secured network, worse network. The whole point of idena is having as much nodes as it is possible to attract advertisers, to be faster and cheaper (with sharding). First time I hear that destroying coin fundamentals (forcing nodes to quit to lower nodes amount) will benefit the price.