Please tell me why the next G20 meeting can't address this email exchange as a serious threat to their collective authority and resolve to make necessary decrees from the EU to provide the necessary legal authority to prosecute MPOE.
Also MPOE you are taking a huge personal risk here. You better not have the slightest mistake as they might find it easier to take you down with a trumped up charge.
If all else fails, a fiery car accident.
I admire people with balls but combined with some basic common sense. It does me no good to associate with people who are so careless so as to actively seek their own destruction.
You seem to feel very indignant about this and have the sort of Paul Revere attitude of "give me liberty or give me death".
I just think there are much smarter ways of fighting than out in the open. The quality of ones weapons and strategy determines if they are the victor, not the quality of resolve alone.
The Apaches were never defeated because they didn't fight in the open:
http://www.starfishandspider.com/preview/02.htmlI think you would have been much better served to have replied that you need to be legally indemnified before releasing private data. That is all you needed to say. You talk too much. Although you are articulate, you are clearly not an attorney and you should hire one immediately and STFU.
Note I was banned from tortilla's new forum cryptocrypt.org for essentially stating the prior paragraph.
Edit: essentially you are doing political grandstanding. You can't beat society
at its own game. Politics is not the successful strategy.
Dude, you're all over the place. Apaches, G20, fiery car accidents, you sound like a B movie. Which, incidentally, is why all the portentous Internet typing you do fails to matter in any sense.
Anyway, instructive contrast between the 2011 accounts and the last week accounts this thread displays.