I call on @Ratimov @DdmrDdmr @LoyceV @Nutilda @The Pharmacist @Lovesmayfamilis and other detectives in the forum that I do not know to swing into action, make more investigations and bring facts. In the end, a  counter post should be made to override this post. Because I am not certain there would ever be a verdict on this post.

This post has only successfully achieved the following;
1. Instigate lower ranking members(especially the ones mentioned) against one another.
2. Instigated higher ranking members especially the merit sources against the lower ranking members.
3. Instigated the entire forum users against the lower rankingmembers.
4. Perhaps, the only positive thing I see about the thread is that it has shown that there may be alts operating here. But it's weird for me to believe that one person will operate 60+ accounts.
The maximum number of pupils in a class  is 25. So, @RainbowKun has 3 classes he controls here.
-Could that even be possible?
-Has this kind of scenario happened before in bitcointalk?
-How will he be able to achieve the posting if not automated?

My perception and approach to the forum has changed these few days.
I saw a good post that deserves a merit. As I was about meriting the post, I remembered this thread. I can't believe that I practically had to visit this thread to see if the user I am about meriting is listed on the 60+ accounts.
I could not believe myself, I began to question me what exactly am I avoiding;
Being implicated or further implicating other users?

@Ratimov has a thread that encourages users(especially Low ranking users) to rank up. I also applied in his thread, though before he could notice me I already had 99 merits and he gave me my 100th merit. That is a commendable act, as I hope to benefit from that thread again.

But with this post, I hereby put it to you that; your efforts in helping lower ranking members rank up is in futility.
Because; you opened a thread that help them rank up, you opened another (this) to demote people you already helped to rank up.
Please put more sincere efforts to making these things believable. Let's say someone has 5 to 8 accounts, this would be believable, and narrow the investigations than allege 60+ accounts.

I was happy when I saw some lower ranking members like me doing well in the forum, but now most of them are hunted.
I do not want to believe that this is an attempt to impede the growth these users, because you and other established members are always happy seeing newcomers doing well.
These are honestly the future of bitcointalk.

Conclusively, I demand for a counter post by you or any other after some research in order to exonerate some users here and then punish the real offenders(if they exist).
Thank you!