If I may temporarily switch our topic to location and decisions taken regarding it, as known by visitors of this thread that you're based in Mexico and you planned to target mexico and latin america (and worldwide, as you also stated, but the main target market are the two former ones), and that you have already explained that you choose indoex because it's friendly and quite known, and that it will rather reaching too high if you aim for binance, etc. But how about your own local exchange? Wouldn't it be better if you conduct your ICO on latin america local exchange? I assume it'll be more preferred and accessible by your target market instead of indoex which based in UK. I didn't say the decision is poor or anything, I was just interested to know the process behind this decision making
yes, definitely having our own exchange is something that is coming in the near future, in fact it is in the whitepaper, but, as you say, why start with foreign exchanges? its because although the assets are in latin america, the investment comes from where is more money... europe, united states and of course asia, that is where the most important capitals of the crypto world move...
In latin america there are some exchanges, but in principle, the investors we are looking for are from other countries, people who are interested in investing in tokenized properties located in mexico and latin america...
and, as incredible as it may seem, Latin investors always ask if we are in an international exchange before investigating a little more about the project... it's a stoper.
This is quite interesting. Just to be sure, one of your project's main selling point is token holders are entitled to the properties in R223, is there any specific term on this "ownership" and like it only happens virtually and not in real physical world? Or investors got them in full package like if they bought property conventionally; land deeds and all.