I agree entirely with you. I am surprised that anybody could or would oppose the flag, it does not make sense to me.
I echo your sentiments because why on earth would anybody oppose the flag instead of just opting to not support it especially from members that should know better keeping in mind all the evidence that has been presented to show the betking.io scam
In order to protect gullible investors from getting scammed this thread really should stay open because even though it would be impossible to save everybody just saving one person from becoming a victim would mean the thread has been successful.
I don't see any reason for you to oppose support for the flag.
The Flag wasn't created correctly.
As you yourself point out, the flag creator is not the one who created the thread. Therefore it can be locked without intervention by the flag creator. The OP of the thread you pointed me in the direction of has no flags listed, so no Flags supported.
Okay?
Deciding not to support the flag is one thing, but you're opposing support for it which only serves to give credibility to the scammer.
And besides, I don't see any issue with creating a flag that references a thread that you didn't create - there's no reason to believe Jollygood will lock the thread, and if he does the flag can be removed - we don't need another Betking scam thread and Jollygood creating another identical flag just seems redundant.