I think that it is not entirely correct to assess the success of a project in the gambling industry by the market capitalization of its token. If we consider the other most famous gambling sites, which in particular have their own topics in this section of BTT, then BetFury can be confidently considered a member of the first hundred, or rather, probably even the first 30. I still do not quite understand why such a criterion as the first hundred in terms of capitalization is used in this case. It is necessary to look in the section of the profiles of cryptopoojects. In my opinion - In this case, this is the profile of gambling projects using cryptocurrencies.
Well, simply because they decided that their token is a product they created? I mean sure if we are talking about crypto casinos rankings then I would put betfury into top 30 easily, that makes sense but at the end of the day they also have a token and ignoring that would not provide anything useful. Plus, if it is their own token then where would we talk about it? We would talk about it on their own topic of course. Also tokens do end up having some sort of listing as well, and that listing on CMC usually shows where you are ranked and they can't ever be in the top 100, he is right.
It is totally fair to judge them based on their token because even though the casino part is not bad, we need to talk about the token they created and we can't keep it a secret so if we are going to talk about it then it will be here and all of our predictions will be here as well, it is just natural.