I can't say I've don much digging on this user but, from what have been provided so far on the LoyceV's report plagiarism thread, this might seem to be his only case though, Airfinex argues to have more compromising evidence
I am one of those people who like to shake the nerves of others, so if Mpamaegbu successfully appeals against the ban and is unbanned, I will provide new evidence since I have something in store. I am such an obnoxious brute only on weekends, on other days I enjoy watching such scandals drinking Piña colada.
[/quote]
That seems like a waste of time. If there's more, he shouldn't get unbanned.
[/quote]
for which, I would have suggested he provides them and the case be treated as a whole and not in batches which would be exhausting.
Given the benefit of the doubt, I still want to believe its the only one and go with the excuse of it being a honest mistake. To some extent I see him to have meant well, discovering a similar thread and went ahead to lock his thread
I'll quote
Mpamaegbu's last post in that topic:
Quote from: metenjean on March 19, 2018, 08:39:22 AM
Oops! My bad. I didn't see the other thread eventhough I searched the forums before putting out mine. Yes, quickly I will lock up this thread now. Sorry about that.
in that quote was created an hour before Mpamaegbu's topic, and is created by someone who is by now banned too. Probably because it's also plagiarism.
It was a right step and a hasty move that could erase the possibility of an error that needs correcting on a thread from a user.
Giving the fact that, he categorically stated that, a smuggled snippet content was to be stated below.
The post in question seems to be referencing the copied text as "smuggled out snippet below" so arguably Mpamaegbu was not trying to claim authorship of that text.
[...] many are likely to conclude with the smuggled out snippet below [...] May be you will agree ir disagree with the positions below.
As an intentional disclaimer of owner ship on projection and should be considered.
Mpamaegbu is an active forum contributor and very active too in the Nigerian locale. Statistics recently provided in this thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5357434.0 by Igehhh and those provided by Tranthidung here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5357434.msg57862544#msg57862544, goes the far length to express how active his been lately and have helped a lot of Nigerians amongst other nationals on the forum I believe, to have a forward with their bitcointalk journey.
Opinions of everyone I highly respect, the forum rules and rulings too but, I would plead mercy for this fellow as, I've come to acknowledge him as a reputable and positive forum contributor. If no further complication from this fellow, treating an over 2years slipped mistake with some mercy and a Temporal ban if there is a need at a looking at the fact that, he didn't completely credit the post in question to himself would be something.