I've added to my proposal a textual visualization on what the hierarchy would look like.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.msg5783153#msg5783153EDIT:
Some examples to show what I'm talking about.
Asset Short name Long name
BITT BITT
KEOdAi3q BITT.spanish.dubloon
OIu3waqn BITT.spanish.dubloon#1
RPGGAME RPGGAME
LPJhiowG RPGGAME.ruby.cracked
jrOyehHG RPGGAME.ruby.perfect
BANK BANK
OIJFE7ig BANK.I can type whatever I like
Client visualization
BITT
+-spanish
+-dubloon
+-dubloon#1
RPGGAME
+-ruby
+-cracked
+-perfect
BANK
+-I can type whatever I like
Client visualization alternative - reflects the reality that there is only 2 levels
BITT
+-spanish.dubloon
+-spanish.dubloon#1
RPGGAME
+-ruby.cracked
+-ruby.perfect
BANK
+-I can type whatever I like
How much of this proposal, and of other similar proposals, can be handled by the asset description field? (Not much space is needed to store a URL.).I love namespaces, etc., but I want to keep the protocol-level as simple and as stupid as possible. We could do this sort of thing is Counterwallet and BootleXCP themselves, for example.