However, the Pablo James account was banned.
Yeah, well earned, a double case of plagiarism is deliberate, and it's my fault for not looking at it from the appropriate perspective. I don't support a case of double plagiarism; looking at Pablo's activity, it's clear that the forum isn't significant to him, or that he's bored of copying and pasting other people's work in an attempt to find merits, but failing.
Also, yesterday's case with the plagiarism warning of newcomer DanielBroonze about adding a link to his post was also banned. He was warned several times, but he didn't fix anything.
Not everyone is this lucky though

As for getting plagiarism out of the archive, and further persecution of the one who committed it, this is madness. And I did not create the topic for this at all.
This is a resounding NO!!! Anything in the archive should be kept in the archive, and every action should be based on what proof can be found in the sands of time, rather than anything that was destroyed or tossed into the air a long time ago.